Report: Handmade Emulsion with Sight Unseen

Below is a brief report of our Handmade Emulsion workshop held in Baltimore, Maryland on July 12th & 13th at Current Space and in collaboration with Sight Unseen. The workshop was lead by Process Reversal members Andy Busti and Kevin Rice.

10561524_10154365470360623_4756536715685663779_n

Image 1 – Participants shooting outside Current Space in Baltimore, MD

In this workshop, a small fraction of the theories and practices relating to emulsion making were discussed and implemented in the generation of two different emulsions. These emulsions were then coated on to 16mm clear acetate leader and used for in camera photography. Below are the notes relating to each of these emulsions and their resulting images.

Image 2 - Lecturing...

Image 2 – Lecturing…

Emulsion 1

Below is the formula for our first emulsion, E1, a neutral bromide emulsion. The materials for the formula were sourced from various suppliers and locations: the potassium bromide came from the Photographers Formulary in Montana, the silver nitrate from ArtCraft Chemicals in New York, the distilled water from a local 7 Eleven, and finally the Knox brand food gelatin from a grocery store in Boulder, CO.

TECHNICAL DATA  E1
Type Single Jet, Bromide, Neutral
Approx. Shelf Life 3.00 months
Coating Capacity +/- 25.00 ft²
pH
SOLUTION A
Distilled Water 63.0 ml
Potassium Bromide [KBr] 8.0 g
Active Gelatin 10.0g
SOLUTION B
Distilled Water 63.0 ml
Silver Nitrate [AgNO3] 10.0 g

Table 1 – E1 Technical Specifications and Formula

The formulas constituents were divided into two solutions: Solution A contained the gelatin and bromide salt whereas solution B contained the silver salt. Both solutions were mixed separately from each and with strict care so as to avoid any cross contamination. This process was carried out at room temperature so as to avoid excessive condensation of the water from the solutions, after which they were brought to emulsification temperature (approx. 60 C). Solution A was contained within a sterilized 250.0 ml pyrex beaker whose temperature was maintained by a dual hot plate / magnetic stirrer. Solution B was also contained within a sterilized, 100.0 ml, pyrex beaker but was heated in a water bath before being divided between two plastic syringes fitted with very fine nozzles. At this point, the room lights were taken out and the emulsification process commenced under safelight.

Emulsion Making

Image 3 – Preparation of the solutions

Emulsification

Emulsification was carried out as a sub-surface, single jet addition across two stages: the first stage saw the rapid addition of half of the silver nitrate into the halogen rich gelatin in an attempt to create an environment optimized for critical nucleation of the silver halide crystals. During this first addition, a malfunction occurred with the syringe tip which became dislodged from the syringe and fell into the solution. This was ignored momentarily and the emulsion was allowed to ripen for 15 minutes, without agitation, before the tip was removed using a sterilized glass stirring rod. Following this, the next stage of emulsification commenced whereby the second half of the silver nitrate solution was slowly added across 20 minutes in an attempt to produce fine precipitates that would be more readily nucleated by the larger crystals precipitated through the first stage. At the conclusion of this second addition, the emulsion was allowed to sit for approx. 5 minutes without agitation before being chilled rapidly.

Image 4 – One of the syringes and nozzles used to create the jet for solution B. The syringe was sourced from a gardening supply store whereas the nozzle was purchased seperately from an art supply store, both in Denver, CO.

Washing

In order to remove the by-products produced in the emulsification stage (namely for coating reasons), the emulsion was washed in the old tradition of “noodling.” This was done by pressing the emulsion through a fiberglass mesh and catching the fine strands in 4 layers of unbleached cheesecloth fixed to the mouth of a bucket. Ice water was then repeatedly poured over the noodles, using the fiberglass mesh to filter out any ice cubes, until about 1.5 gallons of water had been poured across the emulsion. After this, 0.5 gallons of cold distilled water was used to complete the washing of the emulsion before being carefully consolidated into the original emulsification vessel and remelted.

Chemical & Spectral Sensitization

The emulsion was not treated with any sensitizers other than those initially present in the gelatin.

Finals & Coating

After remelting the emulsion, 20.0 ml of Kodak photo-flo 2000 was added as a surfactant to aid in the coating process. This was the only final addition to the emulsion.

Coating was performed under a safe light using a film rewind to feed the pre-subbed, 16mm acetate film base onto a coating wheel. Participants worked together to maintain tension across the system and apply the emulsion using two different styles of brushes: (1) A ¾” Hake style brush and (2) A ¾” Blick Studio synthetic brush, the latter of which was found to produce the “best” coating results.

Emulsion Making

Image 5 – A Hake brush, the preferred method of coating. The brushes used during the workshop were purchased at a local art supply store.

After the first coat was complete,  the film was allowed to dry for over an hour before a second coat was applied using an airbrush. Finally, the film was allowed to sit in darkness overnight to dry to completion.

Photography & Development
Emulsion Making

Image 6 – Participants go out to photograph local scenes…

The following day, the coated film was wound onto a daylight spool for in-camera photography with a Bolex Rex 5. Half of the participants went out to photograph local scenes with the emulsion while the second half began producing the second emulsion discussed below. Exposure for the emulsion was determined using a spot meter with the film rated at 10 (purely out of guesstimation) and only 50 feet was photographed to begin with.

TECHNICAL DATA  KODAK DEKTOL
Type Developer (MQ based, High Energy)
Approx. Shelf Life 3.00 months
Capacity +/- 30.00 ft² per. 1,000.00 ml
pH 11.0
STOCK SOLUTION
Water @ 52.0 C 750.0 ml
Metol [C7H9NO · 1/2H2SO4] 3.0 g
Sodium Sulfite, Anhydrous [Na2SO3] 45.0 g
Hydroquinone [C6H4(OH)2] 12.0 g
Sodium Carbonate (Monohydrate) [Na2CO3· 1H20] 80.0 g
Potassium Bromide [KBr] 2.0 g
Water to make… 1,000.0 ml

Table 2 – Approx. technical specifications and formula for Kodak Dektol

Development of the emulsion was carried out in a 50 foot LOMO tank using Kodak Dektol, a high energy print developer, with a development time of 2 minutes. To avoid damaging the film, agitation was not used. Following development, the film was then rinse delicately and fixed in a hardening fixer for approx. 2 minutes before a brief final rinse. This first run was then hung to dry while the second half of the film was photographed.

Image 6 - The camera original negative is hung for drying after processing…

Image 7 – The camera original negative is hung for drying after processing…

Analysis

While equipment was not available to us for adequately test the sensitometric properties of the emulsion, we can make a few assumptions: First, we know that no spectral sensitizers were used and thus the emulsions sensitivity can be defined as class 1, sensitive only to the native absorption properties of the silver bromide crystals. Accordingly, the emulsion was primarily sensitize to the UV spectrum as well as some portions of violet and blue light.

Figure 1 - Sensitivity of a Class 1 (Unsensitized) Emulsion.

Figure 1 – Approx. visibility curve of a class 1 (Unsensitized) emulsion.

Figure 2 - Approx. spectral composition of daylight.

Figure 2 – Approx. spectral composition of daylight at sea level.

When exposed under daylight, the emulsion exhibited a sensitivity equivalent to International Standards Organization (ISO) 10, and is therefore considered a very slow, and thus fine fine grained, emulsion. Additionally, based on the visual appearance of the negative, the emulsion appears to have been able to render scenes with a 5-7 stop range, even when processed with a high energy developer (i.e. Kodak Dektol), and thus can be classified as a “low contrast” emulsion. This, coupled with the knowledge of how the film was emulsified, indicates that the emulsion grains were polydispersed and thus exhibited a great deal of variation in size. Finally, given the halogen and the emulsification methodology, we can make the assumption that the crystal habit yielded a fairly decent portion of tabular grains, along with various other grain structures, most of which probably did not exhibit any properties of photosensitivity (i.e. a low efficiency emulsion). Sensitivity was also certainly altered by the choice of gelatin, which in this case was not inert. In that sense, it can be loosely categorized as an “active” gelatin, and thus would have contributed some portion of sulfides and other constituents that would have increased the sensitivity.

Below is documentation of the camera original negative, as well as a digitally inverted timed “print” of the footage. Additionally, some high resolution blow ups have been chosen for the gallery below, including high magnifications of the granularity of the film, which can be characterized as very high, most likely because of grain migration and clumping during development and not because of the grain structure…


Video 1 – The camera original negative; Due to the host sites video compression, it is suggested that the original file be downloaded for optimal viewing.

Gallery 1 – Camera original negative; select frames. A ZIP file with higher resolution files can be downloaded here.

Frain detail

Image 7 – Grain detail

Contact Prints

Two contact prints were also struck from the original negative by workshop participants. This was done by bi-packing a daylight spool with both the original negative and our raw print stock, and then exposing it without a lens and with an enlarger as a light source. Two different print stocks were used: Kodak 7302 Fine Grain positive Release and Kodak 7363 High Contrast Positive II.

The 7363 print was mostly over exposed and highlighted many of the emulsion coating defects, making the imagery extremely “abstract.” The 7302 print, on the other hand, was very well exposed and resolved many of the details of both the images and the emulsion coating. In both cases, only the first 50 feet of the camera original was printed…


Video 2 – The bolex contact prints struck during the workshop. Again, due to the host sites video compression, it is suggested that the original file be downloaded for optimal viewing.

Emulsion 2

Image 8 – Some of the emulsion making equipment and chemicals

Below is the formula for the second emulsion formula, E2, a neutral chloride emulsion. The recipe utilized much of the same constituents as the first emulsion, except that sodium chloride was used in place of potassium bromide as a source for the halogen. This was sourced from The Science Company in Denver, CO.

TECHNICAL DATA  E2
Type Single Jet, Chloride, Neutral
Approx. Shelf Life 3.00 months
Coating Capacity +/- 75.00 ft²
pH
SOLUTION A
Distilled Water 500.00 ml
Sodium Chloride [NaCl] 12.0 g
Active Gelatin 90.0g
SOLUTION B
Distilled Water 100.0 ml
Silver Nitrate [AgNO3] 25.0 g

Table 3 – E2 technical specifications and formula

Emulsification

Emulsification was carried out nearly identically to that of the first emulsion, except that participants used a stainless steel film processing tank to act as the emulsification vessel. During each addition, one participant would stir the emulsion with a glass rod while another injected the silver nitrate solution.

Washing

This emulsion was not washed in order to save time. This should not have had an appreciable effect on the sensitivity of the emulsion, but may have resulted in problems with the coating as the salt by-products precipitated out of the emulsion.

Chemical and Spectral Sensitization

Again, no chemical or spectral sensitizers were added to the emulsion.

Finals & Coating

Approx. 30.0 ml of Kodak Photo-Flo 2000 was added as a surfactant to aid in the coating process. This was the only final addition to the emulsion. The same coating arrangement was used as with the first emulsion, except that both coats were performed using hake brushes only. Additionally, participants coated several sheets of paper for use in photographic enlargements.

Photography & Development

By the time the film was dry, there was no longer sufficient daylight to photograph the roll; this was instead given up to the workshop participants, and as of this writing, the roll has not been transferred. However, some of the coated sheets were used to create enlargements which were then processed in the same manner as the first emulsion. No scans of these enlargements has been performed as of this writing…

Analysis

Because there wasn’t enough time to really adequately photograph and develop the emulsion, analysis is limited. Based on the sheets that were processed, the emulsion appeared to be very, very slow (equivalent to 1 ISO) However, this could be attributed to a number of factors; for one, chloride emulsion are almost exclusively sensitive to the UV spectrum. Since the exposure source for the enlargements was primarily tungsten, the amount of light absorbed by the emulsion would have been limited to a fraction of this light, thus resulting in very long exposure times. Second, the sheets were only coated once which did not appear to be able to yield significant density even with extensive exposure and development times. Thus a second coat was applied to the sheets, but there was not enough time to expose these and gauge the difference.

Extended Resources:

A PDF of some basic resources, including conversions and formulas, can be downloaded here. In addition to this, the following resources can also be explored…

Literature

The following selection of literature is a fairly comprehensive list of text relating to the process of emulsion making and it’s related sciences. Some of these text are highly recommended and have been indicated as such with an asterisk (*) Additionally, any hyperlinked text are available to download from Process Reversals website at http://processreversal.org/literary-resources/

Practical Guides to Emulsion Making
These text are recommended for those interested in practical examples and insights into creating emulsions…

Historic Emulsion Text
These text are recommended for those seeking historical context to the emulsion making process. Many of them will discuss emulsion making techniques and formulas, but it’s important to understand that any literature dealing with emulsion published before the 1940’s assumes the use of photograde ACTIVE gelatin, which is no longer produced. Everything following that assumes the use of inert gelatin.

Emulsion Chemistry & Theory
These text are recommended for those interested in studying the theory and science of emulsion making.

Sensitometry

  • General Sensitometry (Gorokhovskii, Yu. N.; Levenberg, T.M. – 1965)
  • Photographic Sensitivity: Theory and Mechanisms (Tadaaki, Tani – 1995)

Photochemistry

Reference Books
These books are helpful as references for various formulas and darkroom techniques

  • Photographic Lab Handbook, 5th Edition (Carroll, John S. – 1979)
  • The Darkroom Cookbook, 3rd Edition (Anchell, Stephen G. – 2009)*

Artist Run Film Labs

  • Kinetica: Lieux d’Experimentations Cinematographiques en Europe (Gran Lux – 2011)
Web Resources
  • Analog Photographers User Group (APUG.org)
    This website houses the most popular forum relating to analog photography. While not specifically relating to motion picture film, there are many conversations and researchers of interest, including Ron Mowery (http://www.apug.org/forums/members/photo-engineer/) who is particularly informative on the theory and practice of emulsion making and has contributed heavily to the APUG subsection on Silver Gelatin Based Emulsion Making (http://www.apug.org/forums/forum205/). To subscribe to the forum, follow the instructions here: http://www.apug.org/forums/register.php
  • The Light Farm (thelightfarm.com)
  • Film Labs (filmlabs.org)
    This website houses information on various artist run film labs around the world and is also the host of the “film labs forum,” a subscription based mailing list featuring discussions on all varieties of lab related subjects. To subscribe to the forum, follow the instructions posted here: https://listes.domainepublic.net/listinfo/forum
  • Graphic Atlas (graphicsatlas.org)
    This website is dedicated to the documentation of various photographic processes and contains a very impressive collection of articles and images relating to the identification and archival handeling of various photogrpahic images. 
  • Molecular Weight Calculator
Chemical Suppliers

10509594_10154365388955623_3293049940600077642_n

Photo Credit: Margaret Rorison. For more photos of the workshop, a zip file can be downloaded here.

Images from Investigations, Part I: Basic Silver Gelatin Emulsion

Below are images from the first part in our series of investigations into photochemical engineering. Within the seminar, we created five emulsions, each of which followed the same formula but utilized a slightly different mode of emulsification in an attempt to increase efficiency. These emulsions were then used to produce a fifty foot roll of 35mm celluloid, ten feet of 16mm celluloid, and several 4×5 paper negatives and tin types…

16mm “Test Strips”:

Co-instructor, Robert Schaller (handmadefilm.org) was able to photograph several 16mm “test strips” of each emulsion in-camera, bracketing in between to give a sense of variation in sensitivity between each emulsion. Below are images of the same approx. exposure value (exposure time: 1/65th | f/stop: 2.8) but of two different emulsions: our control, emulsion 1.0, and a variant, emulsion 1.4 which utilized a different emulsification profile to increase sensitivity. The results show that this variation significantly increased density and tonal range…

Emulsion 1.0 test strip, frame 53

Emulsion 1.4 test strip, frame 94

An additional variable in this test, however, was the fact that the 1.4 test strip was coated a second time using an airbrush. A better impression of this can be given in the following frame by frame transfer of the film strips, rendered at 12 frames per second…

Further sensitometric test will need to be carried out for a greater analysis of the emulsions. In the meantime, high resolution single frames can be downloaded from this directory.

35mm Negative & 16mm Reduction Print:

In the seminar, participants were able to coat a fifty foot length of 35mm celluloid for photography in our hand crankable DeVry. Following it’s exposure, this strip was processed as a negative which was then used to make two 16mm reduction prints on KODAK 7363, High Contrast Positive II print stock: The first print is a 1:2 step print, and the second is a standard 1:1 print…

Scans of the original 35mm negative are forth coming…

4″ x 5″ Paper Negatives & Tin Types:

Participants were also given access to a 4″ x 5″ large format still camera to use for testing the emulsion. For this, both paper and tin plates were coated with all varieties of emulsion and exposed in camera at an exposure index of 6. Development of the paper negative and tintypes was performed using Kodak D-19 at a temperature of 20 degree Celsius for 2 minutes with a standard agitation profile. In this process, we found that the 1.4 emulsion gave the best results in terms of contrast and density, indicative of an increase in performance. This gain, however, was not terribly appreciative — 0.5 or 1 stop faster — in contrast to Robert Schallers test strips above which illustrate a potential increase of speed of well over 3 or 4 stops. As mentioned before, though, this could have more to do with the coating than with the emulsification, and so further test will need to be made…

emulsion

Emulsion 1.2

Emulsion 1.2

Emulsion

Emulsion 1.4

Tin Types:

The tintypes below illustrate a significant amount of reticulation (cracking of the emulsion) by comparison to the rest of the materials produced during the workshop. This is likely has to do with the poor subbing of the plates, but could also have to do with the extended fixing times needed for processing the plates. This is because many of the plates had very thickly coated emulsions, sometimes too thick to be adequately processed, such as is in the final image below. Additionally, density and contrast were not quite adequate enough for creating the positive effect desired in tintypes. Our most successful in this regard was the first image below:

Emulsion

Emulsion 1.3

Emulsion

Emulsion 1.2

Emulsion

Emulsion 1.3

Emulsion

Emulsion 1.4

Images from Handmade Emulsion with MONO NO AWARE

Below are images and video documentation from our recent Handmade Emulsion Workshop with MONO NO AWARE. During this workshop, participants prepared and coated emulsion from scratch onto 16mm clear acetate leader. The majority of these coatings were on short (approx. 0.3 meter long) “test strips” which were then used to create simple photograms with an enlarger. However, two longer (approx. 30 meter) strips were produced using a rack system developed by Joshua Lewis of MONO NO AWARE. These strips were used to create two contact prints — one of un-split 8mm provided by workshop participant David Beard, and another of 16mm negative provided by workshop co-educator Sarah Bigaini. Following printing, all strips were processed as negative.

The majority of the material from the workshop survived for the transfer below; however, the un-split 8mm footage is actually a contact print produced from the original handmade emulsion onto 7363 (Kodak High Contrast Print Stock) by David Beard and Joshua Lewis. One of the most obvious difference between this print and the original material is the tint of the emulsion with the original material clearly trending towards warmer tones. This is partially because of limited fixing and rinsing of the films emulsion as it is very fragile during processing and must be handled very limitedly in order to prevent it from lifting entirely from the films base.

IMGP5195

IMGP5198

IMGP5197Photo Credit: David Beard

Video Transfer: DiJiFi (Brooklyn, New York)

Process Reversal – Persons & Films

Recently, we went about the task of scanning some of our films for an informational section in TIE’s Alternative Measures Monograph. Here are some of the resulting images…

Andrew Busti
Andrew BustiAndrew BustiAndrew BustiAndrew BustiAndrew BustiAndrew Busti
 Sarah Biagini

Sarah BiaginiSarah BiaginiSarah BiaginiSarah BiaginiSarah Biagini

Taylor Dunne

Taylor DunneTaylor DunneTaylor DunneTaylor DunneTaylor Dunne

Kevin Rice

Kevin RiceKevin RiceKevin RiceKevin Rice

Kevin RiceKevin Rice

  Workshops & Experiments

Process Reversal

Process ReversalScan-46

DeVry Standard “Lunch Box”

We recently acquired two DeVry Standard “Lunch Box” cameras to use in our Cinématographe: Hand Cranked Cinema workshop this November for TIE’s Alternative Measures festival.

These cameras photograph in full aperture 35mm and can either be driven by a hand crank or from a spring. Additionally (although not specifically intended), the cameras can also be used to print and project film similar to the original Cinematographe.

Original Brochure

DeVry Model ADeVry Model ADeVry Model ADeVry Model A

Gaslight

About a month ago, we performed some short experiments utilizing a “gaslight emulsion.” While not a common emulsion for motion picture film, “gaslight emulsion” (which is typically a pure chloride emulsion) was very popular for print making when introduced in the 1890’s under the proprietary name “Velox” as it could be handeled under “gaslight” conditions.

(From the Focal Encyclopedia) “gaslight papers were so called because they could be handled in a darkroom with a single dim gaslight a few feet away without fogging the sensitive emulsion. When placed in a printing frame, the paper was in contact with a negative and was exposed by holding the frame close to the gaslight, which was adjusted to a proper intensity. Development with an alkaline developer was performed under a dim gaslight as well.”

More experiments to follow…

Emulsion

Emulsion

Emulsion

Emulsion

Emulsion

Color Bleach Etching, Part II

Following the workshop on reshaping and lighting film emulsion, Sarah Biagini explores the use of bleach-etching (a.k.a. Mordancage) on Kodak 3383 Color Print Stock. Below are some of the results.

Additionally, you can view our other post on color bleach etching here.

[All images courtesy of Sarah Biagini]

Color Bleach Etch

Color Bleach Etch Color Bleach Etch

Color Bleach Etch Color Bleach Etch

Color Bleach Etch Color Bleach Etch Color Bleach Etch Color Bleach Etch

[Video processed at 12 fps. Additionally, you can download this video here for a full, frame by frame, analysis]

Images from Зеркало: Reshaping & Lighting Film Emulsion (2nd Post)

We’ve gotten around to editing a short video compilation of some of the film strips produced during our workshop Зеркало: Reshaping & Lighting Film Emulsion.

In this video, we produced several short strips of film (40 frames or less) for demonstration purpose using various techniques for reshaping emulsion, including reticulation, bleach-etch (mordancage), and dye-plating.

Because these strips were so short, each one was re-photographed using an optical printer, and than digitally transferred and rendered to loop at 12 fps (similar to step printing every frame twice) to provide a greater opportunity to analyze the footage.

In addition to this, each strip was re-photographed under different lighting conditions, including front lighting, back lighting and simultaneous front & back lighting.

Finally, some strips were re-photographed with a colored back light which could be theoretically filtered out in-camera, thus providing an increase in contrast. This technique, described in the video as ‘channel mixing,’ was simulated using Adobe Photoshop.

Additionally, you can download this video in 720p here.

 Optical printing

Images from the Color of Salt

Here are a few Images from our Tinting & Toning workshop held last July, The Color of Salt. During the workshop, we found a 35mm black & white print which was used to test out tinting & toning work-flows. This was done by sampling strips from the film (roughly 12 frames per strip) and than using them to experiment with the solutions to find a “good” toning procedure. This is because every emulsion will react differently to tinters and toners, necessitating the need to experiment with and study the films reactions before defining a procedure.

After experimenting with the solutions and testing different techniques, participants were than allowed to tone a full reel (about 50 feet) of a scene. These scenes we’re than spliced back together and projected on 35mm for the entire group. Below are some images from that reel and test strips as well as the fully composed transfer of the toned work.

Thanks to everyone who participated in this workshop!

(Note: Many of these images contained multiple tones that simply could not been draw out from their digital re-productions, necessitating film projection as the best possible form of presentation.)

Tinting Toning Film

This frame is an example of how deep a tint can be rendered with dye & mordant solutions. This frame was most likely allowed to stay in the dye for an exaggerated period of time (circa 3 hours) giving it it’s strong magenta tint. If the solutions were to be mixed by hand, it is possible to get even richer tones than this.

Tinting Toning Film

This frame is a good example of deep Iron toning without compromising the integrity of the emulsion. Additionally, their is slight evidence of duo-toning in the green cast found along some of the shadows.

Tinting Toning Film

This frame is simple but beautiful: a mixture of two tints to achieve a subtle purple-blue cast.

Tinting Toning Film

This is a good example of duo-toning: The highlights are a cool blue (iron toned) while the shadows fall towards a subtle warm tone (silver-sulfide). The midtones, as a result, form a grey-green cast…

Tinting Toning Film

This frame is also a fairly good example of duo-toning: The shadows are comprised of silver-sulfide grains (as you can see by yellow edges surrounding denser regions) where as our highlights are composed of a magenta tint.

Tinting Toning Film

This frame simply cannot be reproduced digitally. It actually contains three-tones which subtly move across the frame in a way that only motion picture film can do justice. Because of the complexity of this toning procedure, It was difficult for the chemist to maintain a consistent image when processing by hand.

Tinting Toning Film

Tinting Toning Film

These two frames exhibit striking tones of yellow, green and blue. However, these tones are also inconsistent with the image, moving all over the frame. This could be the result of a variety of factors, but one of the most common reasons is because the emulsion has been hardened. To avoid inconsistent toning, a de-hardener (typically 3% solution of sodium carbonate) is often implemented prior to toning.

Tinting Toning Film

An example of excessive copper toning. Copper toners actually increase the size of the silver grain to such a dramatic extent that they “boil” to the surface of the films emulsion, altering the appearance of the gelatin itself. If the tone is strong enough (and under certain circumstances), it will actually begin to form cracks in the emulsion, as seen here.

Tinting Toning Film

This frame was also excessively toned to the point of reticulation, but with an iron toner instead of a copper toner.

Tinting Toning Film

This frame appears to have been bleached (in a rehalogenating bromide bleach) and than either minimally toned or not toned at all. This is why the images D-Max (maximum density) appears so low — because it is primarily composed of silver halides (AgBr) which do not have as great of a density as fully reduced silver grains.

[You can download this video here for a full analysis at 720p. Simply Right Click and Save link As]

(Note: because the 35mm print was old and in-properly stored before we found it, there was some difficulties both projecting and transferring the film — at one point, the film was actually split in half during our transfer, leaving only half the frame registered.)

Nuclear War – A Study In Color Bleach Etching

Below is a short, graphic study of the color bleach etching technique. This technique requires the use of skip-bleached color film which was generously provided by Nicolas Rey & l’abominable. Attached are a few frames from this short strip of film — roughly 60 frames of KODAK Color Print Stock — produced during our workshop with Klubvizija SC in Zagreb nearly a year ago. Additionally, we will be writing about this technique in our fourth-coming article concerning bleach-etching…

Frame 4 – Original image

Frame 16 – fingerprint & image cracking / reticulation

Color Bleach Etching

Frame 22 – Fingerprint & “spotting”

Color Bleach Etching

Frame 31 – veiling and dye migration

Color Bleach Etching

Frame 33 – Emulsion cracking

Color Bleach Etching

Frame 47 – Tearing and solarization

Color Bleach Etching

Frame 59 – Oxidization

Below: The constructed video transfer of the film strip at 24fps…

Additionally, you can download this video file for a complete analysis at 720p.

Also, some music…